MacMaster Up 41.4% – 27.5% In New Poll

MIRS News Service – Lansing, MI – July 11, 2014

Rep. Greg MACMASTER (R-Kewadin) was up 41.42 to 27.51 percent on Rep. Wayne SCHMIDT (R-Traverse City) in a Strategic National poll conducted in the competitive Republican 37th Senate District primary.

Strategic National is not working for either candidate, said company CEO John YOB, who said MacMaster is in a “very strong position to win” due, in part, to strong TEA Party support from “vote-heavy” Antrim County.

“Schmidt’s margin in his base of Grand Traverse County is surprisingly small and he is losing every other county in this district,” Yob said. “Schmidt is in real trouble so we should expect to see him launch last-minute attacks to change the direction of this race.”

The results are slightly better than those of a poll conducted by conservative activist Jack HOOGENDYK, which had MacMaster up 45 to 19 percent in mid-June (See “Hoogendyk Poll Shows MacMaster Up In 37th,” 6/18/14).

The July 9 survey conducted by Strategic National included 69 percent Republicans, 26 percent independents or third party voters and 5 percent Democrats. All voters polled planned on voting in the GOP primary.

Gov. Rick SNYDER had a 77 percent favorable ranking among those polled. U.S. Senate candidate Terri Lynn LAND‘s favorable rating was 57 percent with 28 percent having no opinion or a neutral opinion.

MacMaster had a favorable rating of 47.55 percent compared to Schmidt’s 39.81 percent. Another 37.79 percent had no opinion or a neutral opinion of MacMaster. For Schmidt, 44.66 percent had no opinion or were neutral on him.


Select Business Subsidies, Endorsements Are Differences In 37th District Senate GOP Primary

State Representatives Wayne Schmidt and

Greg MacMaster face off

By JACK SPENCER | June 26, 2014

Rep. Schmidt (L); Rep. MacMaster (R)

As a former radio and TV meteorologist in the region, Rep. Greg MacMaster, R-Kewadin, held the edge in name recognition when this year’s 37th District State Senate GOP primary race started.

His opponent, however, Rep. Wayne Schmidt, R-Traverse City, has garnered a boatload of endorsements, including the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Grand Traverse County GOP Executive Board, Michigan Retailers Association, Michigan Restaurant Association, Michigan Doctors PAC, Advance Michigan, and the Great Lakes Education Project.

But Rep. Schmidt insists that does not make him the “establishment” candidate.

“No, I’m the candidate that gets things done,” Rep. Schmidt said. “I believe it is better to work with people to find solutions, as opposed to just tossing things out like my opponent has with his road funding plan, which would raid the Natural Resources Trust Fund. In my first two years as a representative, the Republicans were the minority party in the House. I was one of those who helped us win back the majority.

“The organizations and people in Lansing who support me do so because of the people and businesses in Northern Michigan who support me,” he added. “It starts up here. When you see the support I have in Lansing it’s really the people of this district who are speaking.”

Rep. MacMaster doesn’t see it that way.

“There’s no doubt about it, this race is Lansing versus the people of Northern Michigan,” Rep. MacMaster said. “My opponent is receiving strong support from Lansing because of the way he votes. I feel the support I’m receiving in the district is very positive and solid. I think that’s because people know I’ll represent them — not Lansing.”

The 37th District is comprised of all or parts of Chippewa, Luce and Mackinac counties in the Eastern Upper Peninsula and all or parts of Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Emmet and Grand Traverse counties in the Lower Peninsula. The Senate seat is currently held by Sen. Howard Walker, R-Traverse City, who chose not to run for re-election.

Rep MacMaster was the only House member who switched his vote on Medicaid expansion last summer. He voted “yes” in June, the first time the measure was before the House, but “no” when a second vote was taken after Labor Day. Rep Schmidt voted “yes” on Medicaid expansion both times.

Michigan Capitol Confidential posed two questions to the candidates aimed at bringing out what kind of senator each would be if elected.

Q: Both Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Roosevelt began their legislative careers by bucking the leaders of their own caucuses. In recent years, Republican lawmakers in Michigan have virtually ceased attempting to use procedural maneuvers. For instance, offering amendments and trying to force votes to be taken on them to promote alternatives that might be preferred by a majority of their colleagues.

Presuming you win the election, would you occasionally go beyond simply voting “no” and publicly attempt to stop passage of legislation you strongly oppose?

Rep. Schmidt:

Yes and I have done that when the needs of Northern Michigan were at stake.  When it came to the Detroit pension settlement I spoke out against it early on.  So my answer to this question is “yes”, but I think it is something that has to be used sparingly and I think it tends to happen most often on a geographical basis.

But my history has been to work with people in the Capitol on policies that are good, not only for those in my constituency, but for those across the state.  I’m about solving problems.  You can’t usually get all that you want, but getting three-quarters of a sandwich is better than getting no sandwich at all, because it allows you to survive.

Rep. MacMaster:

Yes, and I’ve done that. You really can’t do it procedurally because the administration won’t allow it. But I spoke out against the Medicaid expansion the second time around, and on the gas tax issue I offered an alternative to it, which would include repealing the [state’s] prevailing wage law. On the Detroit bailout I didn’t just vote against it, I spoke out loudly and clearly against doing it.

Q: The Michigan Economic Development Corp. (MEDC), which is known as the state’s corporate welfare arm, gets about $300 million in annual funding while having the reputation of lacking transparency. Even legislators have complained about not receiving information they’ve requested from the MEDC.

As a lawmaker would you seek information from the MEDC to test its transparency? If you thought the results were unsatisfactory, would you say so publicly? What other actions, if any, would you take?

Rep. MacMaster:

My answer is yes. Not only would I do that in the future but I have spoken out publicly about the lack of transparency at MEDC. In fact, I was quoted in a CapCon story not long ago talking about the need for more transparency from MEDC and against the high salaries at MEDC.

Rep. Schmidt:

When I was chair of the [House] Commerce Committee we worked to reform the MEDC. So I understand the problems and frustrations. We streamlined it a lot so it would be clean and more transparent. Yes, there are still problems as people adjust to the changes. But I think we’ve made great strides and you’ll see the improvement as time goes on.

It would be easy to just throw up our hands and say we’re not going to do this (have agencies like MEDC) anymore. But I’m not in favor of doing that as long as we have to compete for jobs with other states that do such as North Carolina, Texas and Ohio.

Editor’s note: Michigan Capitol Confidential will be reporting and writing about key primary races leading up to the election on Aug. 5. The series of stories are designed to provide readers with some insight into candidates who have said they support free market issues. The stories are not endorsements and readers are encouraged to give every candidate a serious look before the election. 

~~~~~


ACRP Meeting Minutes for May 19, 2014

7:34 p.m.  Meeting called to order by Chairman – Randy Bishop, Prayer by Marv Rubingh, Pledge of Allegiance

Introduction of officers: Welcome 1st time visitors.

Secretary’s Report – Priscilla Miller: NDAA calls for indefinite detention of American Citizens, without trial, if ‘suspected’ of being a terrorist by Obama.  Benishek voted for the bill. On May 1st Supreme Court refused to hear case. Only recourse is state nullification.

Randy Bishop: Suggests contacting Sheriff Bean, to see if he would comply with NDAA.

Motion to approve April 21st. ACRP Meeting Minutes by Jim Gurr,  2nd Jim Argo. Approved without objection.

Treasurer’s Report – Vice Chair: Laura Bogdan: Corporate Account: $x,xxx.xx  State Account: $xx,xxx.xx

Randy Bishop: Motion for Betsy Argo to be elected Treasurer. 2nd by Brad Brown.  Motion passed unanimously.

Chairman Randy Bishop’s Report: Sharon Wise, State Committee Co-Chair said, “the best Pizza & Politics ever!” Possibility of holding State Committee Meetings in Antrim County, on a rotating basis.  Will be considered at their next meeting.   Shanty Creek made $xx,xxx.xx in rooms, $x,xxx.xx at their bar.

Review of 67 Precinct Delegates who filed to be on the August 5th primary ballot. Need 21 more to file as write in candidates, with township clerks, get three people to vote for them.  Having all  88 delegate openings filled, would attract attention statewide. Delegates will play important role in ‘crucial election of Terri Lynn Land. Delegate list will be posted on ACRP web site.

2nd Annual ACRP Fun Day Saturday, July, 19th. ‘A-Ga – Ming Golf Resort’  BBQ Dinner $25. with golf $75. Chairman Brad Brown. Lt. Gov. Calley, Sec. of State Ruth Johnson, Congressman Dan Benishek and his primary challenger Alan Arcand, will attend. Candidates from the 105th House District race have been invited.

Marv Rubingh: Lee Chatfield, running in 107th. will be at his dairy farm in Ellsworth, on Friday, May 23 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Maryanne:  Triston is having a fundraiser at Shooks Family Farm, on Sunday, May 25 from 1- 3:00 p.m.

Fundraiser June 7th. at Friske’s Farm Market, for Triston Cole and Greg MacMaster. 1:p.m.

Tom Stillings: Has tickets for Bill Schuette’s BBQ, at Howard Walker’s house June 17th. 5:30 -7:30  only $50. for entire family and friends.

Jim Nothoff and Carol Perrin: To prevent any conflict of interest, invite all candidates to share events on acrpmi.org web site.  Randy, will send e-mail blast to membership, inviting candidates to share their events with ACRP and  c.c. e-mail to include all candidates. Contact Randy at acrpchairmanrb@gmail.com

Antrim County Commission Chairman: Mike Crawford from Dist. 6: Addressed issues facing the county: Serious challenges in coming years. Budget is most serious problem. Will regain our Revenue Sharing in 2017, “ Has governor’s word on that. It’s huge for this county.” Also VP of MAC ‘Workman’s Comp Loss Fund, self insured, saves county lots of money. Biggest challenge is Economic Development. Also spoke about Glacial Hills, and the Dura plume. He feels DEQ is responsible for clean up. Not even in the top ten of the DEQ risk list. “State let Dura walk away, left one and a half million dollars, to do something, but the state is out of money.”

Randy Bishop: The DEQ has the money, to force Att. General Bill Schutte, to appeal judges decision favoring pig farmer, Mark Baker’s case. DEQ answers to Gov. Thinks it’s time for a talk with Snyder.

Discussion on holding County Commission meetings in the evenings, so more people could attend.

County Commissioner Ed Boettcher: Dist #4.  Spoke about Glacial Hills bike trail, Fiber optic network, consolidate eight 911 call centers in 11 counties, will cost half as much, Michigan Economic Development Corp. Pure Michigan, and reaching out to industry. Individual in audience observed; people are leaving the state, no industry, only service jobs available.

Laura Bogdan; Who solicits jobs to MI? Answer: MEDC and Pure Michigan. Wants to see rail system return.

County Commissioner Christian Marcus; spoke about utilizing technology: Looking forward to going fully electronic. Urged people to get involved, go to meetings, run for office. Transportation in county evolving, elderly depend on it.

Introduction of candidates running for Antrim County Commission: Dawn LaVanway, Marv Rhubingh, Brenda Ricksgers

 

9:15 Motion to adjourn; Brad Brown: 2nd Jim Gurr


I AM a Republican,…However…!!! By Tom Stillings

Tom StillingsI am a Republican. Make no mistake about it. However, in light of Eric Cantor’s primary defeat yesterday, the party, both national and here in Michigan needs to sit up and take note.

Much like the story that Ronald Reagan often told about leaving the Democrat Party to become a Republican, my position and observations leave me at odds with the party on several issues.

That being said, there is no way that I will switch to being a Dem.

I get the feeling that I am far from alone in my observation that I have never left the party, but that the party is far too often “leaving me” (Thanks for that terminology goes to Ronaldus Magnus).  It is my hope that there are enough kindred spirits out there who will help apply pressure to put the party back on course to save the republic that we, the public, have obviously chosen to devalue over the last several decades.

Mr. Schostak and the rest of our party leadership, along with too many of our elected officials need to take a lesson from the defeat of Eric Cantor. Real conservatism is a growing phenomenon.  People are tired of the same old promises, accompanied by actions that belie them.  People are tired of incompetence in office, whether it be legislative or executive, state or federal.

We as a party should stand for the concept of quality as opposed to quantity. We as a party should be about the business of supporting candidates who understand the benefit of doing less, but doing so with a certainty that we are that we are doing the right thing, not just “doing something”.

I’ll have more to say about specific issues over the next few days. I’ll welcome all criticism.

Tom Stillings is an Antrim County resident, former candidate for the U.S. Congress from the 1st Congressional District and can be reached via email at; tstillngs@charter.net


Why Team Obama Was Blindsided by the Bergdahl Backlash!!!

By Ralph Peters

“The president and Ms. Rice seem to think that the crime of desertion in wartime is kind of like skipping class.”

Obama

Congratulations, Mr. President! And identical congrats to your sorcerer’s apprentice, National Security Adviser Susan Rice. By trying to sell him as an American hero, you’ve turned a deserter already despised by soldiers in the know into quite possibly the most-hated individual soldier in the history of our military.

I have never witnessed such outrage from our troops.

Exhibit A: Ms. Rice. In one of the most tone-deaf statements in White House history (we’re making a lot of history here), the national-security adviser, on a Sunday talk show, described Bergdahl as having served “with honor and distinction.” Those serving in uniform and those of us who served previously were already stirred up, but that jaw-dropper drove us into jihad mode.

But pity Ms. Rice. Like the president she serves, she’s a victim of her class. Nobody in the inner circle of Team Obama has served in uniform. It shows. That bit about serving with “honor and distinction” is the sort of perfunctory catch-phrase politicians briefly don as electoral armor. (“At this point in your speech, ma’am, devote one sentence to how much you honor the troops.”)

I actually believe that Ms. Rice was kind of sincere, in her spectacularly oblivious way. In the best Manchurian Candidate manner, she said what she had been programmed to say by her political culture, then she was blindsided by the firestorm she ignited by scratching two flinty words together. At least she didn’t blame Bergdahl’s desertion on a video.

The president, too, appears stunned. He has so little understanding of (or interest in) the values and traditions of our troops that he and his advisers really believed that those in uniform would erupt into public joy at the news of Bergdahl’s release — as D.C. frat kids did when Osama bin Laden’s death was trumpeted.

Both President Obama and Ms. Rice seem to think that the crime of desertion in wartime is kind of like skipping class. They have no idea of how great a sin desertion in the face of the enemy is to those in our military. The only worse sin is to side actively with the enemy and kill your brothers in arms. This is not sleeping in on Monday morning and ducking Gender Studies 101.

But compassion, please! The president and all the president’s men and women are not alone. Our media elite — where it’s a rare bird who bothered to serve in uniform — instantly became experts on military justice. Of earnest mien and blithe assumption, one talking head after another announced that “we always try to rescue our troops, even deserters.”

Uh, no. “Save the deserter” is a recent battle cry of the politically indoctrinated brass. For much of our history, wedid make some efforts to track down deserters in wartime. Then we shot or hanged them. Or, if we were in good spirits, we merely used a branding iron to burn a large D into their cheeks or foreheads. Even as we grew more enlightened, desertion brought serious time in a military prison. At hard labor.

This is a fundamental culture clash. Team Obama and its base cannot comprehend the values still cherished by those young Americans “so dumb” they joined the Army instead of going to prep school and then to Harvard. Values such as duty, honor, country, physical courage, and loyalty to your brothers and sisters in arms have no place in Obama World. (Military people don’t necessarily all like each other, but they know they can depend on each other in battle — the sacred trust Bergdahl violated.)

President Obama did this to himself (and to Bergdahl). This beautifully educated man, who never tires of letting us know how much smarter he is than the rest of us, never stopped to consider that our troops and their families might have been offended by their commander-in-chief staging a love-fest at the White House to celebrate trading five top terrorists for one deserter and featuring not the families of those soldiers (at least six of them) who died in the efforts to find and free Bergdahl, but, instead, giving a starring role on the international stage to Pa Taliban, parent of a deserter and a creature of dubious sympathies (that beard on pops ain’t a tribute to ZZ Top). How do you say “outrageous insult to our vets” in Pashto?

Nor, during the recent VA scandal, had the president troubled himself to host the families of survivors of those vets who died awaiting care. No, the warmest attention our president has ever paid to a “military family” was to Mr. and Mrs. Bergdahl.

(I will refrain from criticism of the bumptious attempts to cool the flames of this political conflagration by Secretary Hagel: I never pick on the weak.)

What is to be done? Behind the outrage triggered by Team Obama’s combination of cynicism and obliviousness (Bergdahl was so ill we had to set those terrorists free immediately, without notifying Congress, but now he’s chugging power shakes in a military hospital . . . and all this just happened to come at the peak of the VA scandal . . . ), military members don’t really want to lynch Bergdahl. But they want justice.

Our military leaders need to rediscover their moral courage and honor our traditions, our regulations, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. We need a fresh, unprejudiced 15-6 investigation (the military equivalent of a grand jury). We already know, as the military has known since the first 24 hours after Bergdahl abandoned his post, that sufficient evidence exists for a court-martial, but it’s important to do this by the numbers.

It’s hard to believe that the resulting court-martial would not find Bergdahl guilty of desertion (although there will be heavy White House pressure to reduce the charge to Absent Without Leave, or AWOL, status, a lesser offense). If he is convicted, I for one do not want him to go to prison. I’m sure he has paid and paid for betraying his comrades, quite possibly suffering brutal sexual violence. But if he is found guilty, he needs to be formally reduced to the rank of private, stripped of all privileges and entitlements (the taxpayer should not pay for a deserter’s lifelong health care — Bergdahl’s book and film deals can cover that), and he should be given the appropriate prison sentence, which would then be commuted by the president. Thereafter, let Mr. Bergdahl go home and live with himself.

As for President Obama, how about just one word of thanks to the families of those fallen soldiers you sent out to find Bowe Bergdahl?

— Fox News Strategic Analyst Ralph Peters is a retired Army officer and former enlisted man.


VETERANS ENDORSE GREG MACMASTER – FOR STATE SENATE

Greg MacMaster for State SenateKEWADIN, MI – Fifty-three Michigan veterans, representing four branches of the United States military, today endorsed State Rep. Greg MacMaster (R-Kewadin) for State Senate.

MacMaster, himself a disabled veteran, was endorsed by the following veterans who represent organizations that promote and serve the needs of tens of thousands of veterans across Michigan:

Lon Bargy – Army
Jeff Brooks – Army
Sam Campillo – Army
Greg Croiftchick – Army
Stephen Debusscheere – Army
Owen G. Drake – Army
James E. Emery – Army
Linda Fletcher – Army
Fred Goddard – Army
John Haggard – Army
Arthur Harrington – Army
Tracy Heath – Army
Charles Horvath – Army
Charles Lonnie Jewell – Army
Jerry Langhann – Army
Ron Martin – Army
Duke Mayo – Army
David McVaugh – Army
Calvin Murphy – Army
John L. Palmer – Army
Louie Paolino – Army
Brian Sommerfield – Army
Jack Pickard – Army
Frank Pifher – Army
Ralph H. Pruder – Army
Ralph Rehmer – Army
Michael Richardson – Army
‘Cupcake’ Rizzo – Army
Robert Roelofs – Army
Stan Simons – Army

Gary Hlavka – Navy
Frank L. Lenzott, Jr. – Navy
Curtis Richardson – Navy
Ken Shaw – Navy
Wally Shattuck – Navy

Dave Agema – Air Force
Harold Bastow – Air Force
Gary Biggs – Air Force
John H. Daly III – Air Force
Bill Furguson – Air Force
Neal Horning – Air Force
Randy McClure – Air Force
David McKinnon – Air Force
Scott Miller – Air Force
Al Ockert – Air Force
Gary Walter – Air Force

Jim Alton – Marines
Chuck Cross – Marines
Vic Diaz – Marines
Mike Hoeft – Marines
Dennis Kelly – Marines
Albert C. Keyes – Marines
Larry Lelito – Marines

“Rep. Greg MacMaster has been a key element to my business startup and continued success. As a disabled veteran, I proudly endorse Rep. MacMaster for State Senate,” said Jeff Brooks, Owner of Bravo Zulu Brewing in Williamsburg.

Bravo Zulu, which in military terms means “well done,” strives to promote an authentic sense of honor and donates a portion of their profits to local and national organizations that assist first responders, law enforcement, fire fighters, military personnel, veterans and their families.

“Greg MacMaster is a veteran who’s for veterans’ welfare. As a citizen of Michigan, I support his candidacy for the State Senate,” said Neal Horning.

“I recently contacted Rep. Greg MacMaster regarding a bill in the Military and Veterans Affairs subcommittee, of which he is a member.  After our conversation, he made a point of personally keeping me informed of the progress of the bill, and was instrumental in its passage. Based on his record of addressing the well being of Michigan veterans, as well as my own personal experience, I wholeheartedly endorse Greg MacMaster for State Senate,” said Chuck Cross.

“We need individuals with character in Lansing. Rep. Greg MacMaster has that,” said Jim Alton.

With today’s announcement, the MacMaster campaign has now surpassed 300 local leader endorsements.

“I’m deeply humbled to have the support of these heroes,” MacMaster said. “I will continue to work hard every day to be worthy of their support.”

Your can view his campaign’s website at this link;  – www.GregMacMaster.com 


Minutes of ACRP April 21st, 2014 Monthly Meeting

Antrim County Republican Party Meeting Minutes

Monday, April 21, 2014 Forest Home Twp.. Hall

7:37 Meeting called to order, prayer led by Chairman – Randy Bishop

Introduction of Executive Committee Members.

Motion to approve March 17th, ACRP Meeting Minutes: Mr. Meyers: 2nd Christian Markus:  Approved without objection.

Secretary’s Report: Priscilla Miller, on ACRW Meeting. Brian Koss, Member Relations Director for the State GOP, introduced Danielle Branz, new Regional District Director,  based in Traverse City.  Koss invited people to sign up as Precinct Leaders, at migop.org web site, to work at a grassroots level organizing workers to go door to door, make calls and put up signs. Expressed importance of new ‘Dashboard’ software, that allows workers access to walking, and call lists, enter names of clubs and organizations, to identify Republican voters. Digital Director training available on using Social Media, for targeting voters via Facebook & Twitter.

Congressman Dan Benishek, is being challenged in the primary by Air Force Veteran, Alan Arcand, from Iron Mountain.

Treasurer’s Report: Laura Bogdan:

Corporate Account:  $x,xxx.xx

State Account:  $x,xxx.xx

Chairman – Randy Bishop’s Report:

Laura Bogdan is in charge of “goodie” bags, for State GOP Committee Meeting members, at Shanty Creek Conference Center, on May 2nd and 3rd.(ACRP Fun Day add. printed on side of bags). Brad Brown, has solicited donations to fill bags, with Antrim County informational brochures, dried cherries, fudge, pocket constitutions and trinkets. ACRP Members are encouraged to show up on Friday, by 5:00 p.m. to greet committee members, at the Pizza & Politics event, are asked to wear red ACRP tees, blue pants and white shoes.

Filing deadline for all candidates running in the Michigan Primary, is April  22nd at 4:00p.m. Go to michigan.gov/sos, click on ‘Elections in Michigan’ for all election information.

Asking members to recruit people in their precincts, to run for precinct delegate positions. Deadline for filing Precinct Delegate Affidavits of Identity, is Tuesday, May 6th. at 4 p.m.

Delegates will be our “boots on the ground” talking to neighbors (word of mouth is important) working to put out signs, pass out literature and helping to elect Terry Lynn Land  to U.S. Senate. Getting Land elected, is “paramount”, could be 51st vote, to take control from Harry Reid.  Other candidates running, will be elected on her “skirt tails”. Our goal is to fill all 88 delegate positions. Banks Twp.. gets 7, Central Lake 8, Chestonia 2, Custer 5, Echo 3, Elk Rapids 11, Forest Home 8, Helena 4, Jordan 3, Kearny 7, Mancelona Precinct One 5, Mancelona Precinct two 4, Milton 10, Star 3, Torch Lake 6, Warner 2.  Delegate training session will follow election.  Delegates will be expected to pass out literature and hand out signs in your precincts. Would like all delegates to join the party only $ 20.

Triston Cole: Make sure you try to get 18 year olds, to run as Precinct Delegates.

Jim Gurr: To go to State Convention, you must be a precinct delegate.

Randy Bishop: There’s a new rule change we are going to discuss at a future meeting, where we put together a slate of members who pay their dues, attend meetings and training, people who are most informed, most engaged, to be the ones representing us at the state convention. This election is far too important, we must get all delegate spaces filled, this is our army to get out the vote.

Sign up  friends and neighbors, to receive ACRP E-mail updates, go to acrpmi.org and enter their e-mail address.

ACRP Fun Day will take place at A-GA- Ming Golf Resort, on Saturday July 19th. 18 Hole Scramble at 1:00 p.m. No airplane or motorcycle rides this year due to candidate speakers. BBQ buffet, at 5:00 p.m.Ticket prices: BBQ $25. Golf, including buffet $75.  Proceeds go to our State Campaign account. To register for this event go to ACRP website acrpmi.org  Click on ‘Future Events’ .

Christian Marcus: Urges members to attend just one, Antrim County Commissioner’s Meeting to see what goes on. Early morning meetings prevent working people from attending or running for commission positions. Discussed benefits of having meetings held  evenings, would result in better participation and attendance.

9:03 p.m. Motion to Adjourn Christian Markus, 2nd. Dr. Hoadley


Uprooting the Tree of Liberty?

Will an Article V convention save or entomb America’s liberty?

by ALAN KEYES

Alan Keyes

Phyllis Schlafly was in good form in an article she wrote in April decrying the push for an Article V Constitutional Convention.  She rightly observes that, despite the disclaimers of the supposed conservatives who are backing the idea, it would be hard to keep it from being hijacked by people seeking, for example “a dramatic takeaway of our current Second Amendment right to own guns for personal self-defense.” Given her historic role in thwarting the passage of the so-called “Equal Rights Amendment” (ERA), Mrs. Schlafly speaks with well-earned authority when she foresees a push to revive it in order “to make it unconstitutional to deny a marriage license ‘on account of sex.’”

Schlafly notes the fact that Justice Antonin Scalia, despite his reputation as a conservative, “said he would like an amendment to make it easier to pass more amendments…”  For principled conservatives (i.e., those who understand the importance of respecting the self-evident truths that are the basis for self-government, of, by and for the American people) this statement gives reason to question Justice Scalia’s commitment to conserving the Constitution’s integrity. For it is as the Psalmist says: “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3)

All this reveals what lies at the heart of the extraordinary danger the push for an Article V convention poses to the survival of the republican form of government established by America’s founders.  The first act of the American people was “to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them….”  To justify their action, they pointed to the self-evident truth that all people “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights” and that “to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Who are “the governed”?

At the time the statement was made the people of the United States had not yet consented to the establishment of a national government.  The Confederation government did not come into effect under the Articles of Confederation until Maryland’s legislature ratified the Articles on March 1, 1781.  Up to that point there was no government over the whole people of the United States as such.

So at the moment when the Declaration of Independence speaks with the voice of the whole people, to what government are they referring? In the Declaration the people refer to the laws of nature and of nature’s God.  They appeal to the authorship of the Creator.  The Creator is the ruler whose standard of right, applied in and through His provisions for human existence, authorizes and impels all human beings to take such actions as are essential for preserving and fulfilling their nature.  Since their activities are right, according to God’s will for human nature, human beings who carry on such activities are engaged in the exercise of right, as authorized and protected by the “divine Providence” of the “Supreme Judge of the World”.

The Declaration of Independence mainly consists in a recitation of facts intended to establish that the British Government had acted to usurp, thwart and suppress the people of the United States as they went about their exercise of right in various ways.  In this sense, the people of the United States are in the right.  Their right actions are evidence of their consent to act in conformity with “the laws of nature and of nature’s God”.  By their actions they therefore acknowledge God as their sovereign, by whose will they are governed. In this way, the internal logic of the Declaration makes sense of the phrase “the consent of the governed”.

The Declaration’s logic depends on the Creator’s authority. The people of the United States appeal to His authority in order to substantiate their claim that “these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent states…absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown.”  The authority of the Creator is therefore the first and most fundamental of what Madison calls “the fundamental principles of the Revolution”. (Federalist #39) He goes on to say that it is in light of those principles that  “the plan of the convention”, i.e., the proposed  Constitution of the U.S. government, was devised and must be evaluated.

In our day, what has become of respect for this first premise of America’s liberty, and for the “fundamental principles of the Revolution” that depend upon it?  A substantial majority of the American people still acknowledge the Creator, the sovereign God whose activity promulgates “the laws of nature and of nature’s God.”  But there are others who believe that their own wealth, power or claims of scientific expertise naturally make them the nation’s “ruling elite”.  These elitists by and large reject the principles of the American Revolution.  They acknowledge no will but their own will to power.  They see no justice but in measures that reflect and realize that will.

The outstanding people who approved the American Declaration of Independence, as well as those who later gathered to frame a constitution for the United States, rejected this arrogant elitist mentality.  They did so despite the fact that it was, and had ever been, the prevalent basis for government, not only in their time, but throughout the history of humankind until their time.  They relied instead on a concept of right that was egalitarian in nature, insofar as the path of right laid out by the Creator is naturally open to all human beings who conscientiously choose to follow it.

The chosen representatives of the United States of America’s founding generation realized that the faith, character and circumstances of the American people constituted a Providential opportunity to apply the naturally egalitarian concept of right in order to establish the rule of the people as a whole.  They sought to devise a framework whereby government would be constrained to respect the decent pursuits, activities, and achievements of individuals who choose to exercise the unalienable rights endowed by God); but whereby, in turn, such individuals would be constrained by the rule of God’s justice.  They would therefore have to eschew any presumptive claim to rule over the whole society on account of their achievements, except by and with the consent of the people.  The people were, in their own right and judgment, presumed to be governed by God’s rule, on account of the common declaration and exertions they made to that effect when their society asserted its independent existence as such.

Given what is, for the most part, its evidently self-willed and corrupted character, what hope is there that America’s present corps of outstanding achievers (which I refer to as the elitist faction) will respect the equitable intention of America’s founders?  That intention was unique in the history of humankind. Sad to say, the truly moderate character of the outstanding public figures who shared it was also unique.  In our day, the elitist faction is casting aside all moderation, along with the God-endowed standard of judgment that makes it possible. Relentless war is now being waged against every root and branch of the faithful moral reasoning that was the fruitful and primary instrument of this moderation. Powerful technologies that could to be used to sustain and implement America’s character for self-government are instead being abused to promote every philosophy; every ideology; and every semblance of religion that contradicts that character and therefore tends to break it down.

Justice Scalia’s impatience with the challenges the Framers built into the Constitution’s Amendment process is symptomatic of the self-satisfied disrespect for the enduring wisdom of the founders that now pervades the whole elitist faction. Those who purposely, or inadvertently act in this pervasive spirit may claim that the Constitution has been overtaken by events, but it is their ambition corrupted elitist spirit that mainly casts doubt on the future of self-government of, by and for the American people. How will an Article V Constitutional convention avoid the influence of this pervasive elitist spirit?

Unless it is avoided, what will prevent such a convention from becoming the instrument that, once and for all, severs the American people from the instructive, Providential moment in which the success of their self-government is rooted?  Isn’t the possibility of radically cutting down the tree of liberty in this way the real reason there is so much enthusiasm for an Article V convention from otherwise supposedly disparate elements of the elitist faction? Given the elitist faction’s present stranglehold on the electoral process, what is the likelihood that the people chosen to participate in the Article V convention will reflect the God acknowledging common sense of the American people, rather than the God-rejecting, ambition corrupted spirit of the elitist clique?

Americans still loyal to liberty need to think this through.  Instead of embracing schemes that will open the door to possible dismemberment of their constitutional liberty, they should demonstrate that they are determined to revive the Constitutional and political processes intended to represent, rather than manipulate, repress and betray, the consent of the governed. Otherwise, it becomes more and more probable that an Article V convention will write the epitaph of the American constitutional republic.

Tragically, it will be composed in a way that leaves nothing to memorialize the place of its entombment except the restoration of a tyrannically totalitarian and elitist form of government, destined to erase from human memory any remembrance of the fact that a government of, by and for the people once arose, and briefly flourished to encourage the hope for equitable liberty in decent people everywhere on earth.

###


STATEMENT BY TRAVERSE CITY MAYOR MICHAEL ESTES

Greg MacMaster for State SenateTRAVERSE CITY, MI — During an appearance on WKLT’s Omelette & Friends this morning, Traverse City Mayor Michael Estes made the following statement regarding the 37th District Republican State Senate Primary:
 
“With the departure of 37th District Senator Howard Walker, it is extremely important for the residents of Traverse City, Grand Traverse County and Northwest Michigan to have a strong and effective voice in the Michigan Senate that can represent our concerns and interests.
 
“Representative Greg MacMaster is the strong voice who will represent us well in Lansing and for that reason, I am endorsing his campaign for the 37th State Senate seat.
 
“Local government has done an excellent job in dealing with our core issues but it will take strong Lansing leadership to deal with infrastructure, education and natural resources issues.
 
“I feel that Representative MacMaster’s plan of funding infrastructure first through saving in other expenditures is the approach favored by most northern Michigan voters.   
 
“Representative MacMaster also realizes that our lowest funded school districts need assistance in reducing the funding gaps between excessively funded and under-funded schools and Greg is strongly committed to the preservation of our environment and the protection and expansion of outdoor recreation.
 
“I hope the good citizens of the 37th Senate District will join me in supporting Representative Greg MacMaster as our next State Senator.”

 

###

REP. GREG MACMASTER ENDORSES TRISTON COLE FOR 105TH DISTRICT

Triston Cole endorsed by Greg MacMasterMancelona, MI – The Cole campaign announced today the endorsement of current State Rep. Greg MacMaster in the upcoming Republican primary election for State Representative.

Triston Cole is running in the 105th State House district to succeed Rep. MacMaster who is vacating his seat to seek higher office.

Cole is also endorsed by former 105th district State Representatives Kevin Elsenheimer and Ken Bradstreet, as well as Michigan Farm Bureau
Agri-Pac.

“Triston Cole shares the concerns of Northern Michigan residents and he understands how the legislative process works, which makes him an effective leader who will hit the ground running on Day One,” said Representative MacMaster.

“Over the last three years, I have worked with Triston on numerous policy issues aimed at helping local small-business owners and job providers. With Triston’s guidance, we passed new laws to reduce government regulations and improve Northern Michigan’s economy. I normally don’t endorse candidates in elections but Triston has earned it because of his work ethic, character, and principles. Triston is a true statesman who will represent the district with honor and respect.” said Rep. Greg MacMaster.

“I am honored to have earned Representative MacMaster’s endorsement,” said Cole, a lifelong
resident of Northern Michigan. “My campaign is all about making government smaller and more
efficient so our economy and most importantly hardworking families can prosper. I will continue
working very hard to share my message with as many citizens as possible, and to earn every
single vote needed to win.”

Cole and his wife, Stacy, have three daughters and they live on their farm in Antrim County. A small-business owner, Cole followed his passion for the outdoors and started his own family farm from scratch in 2000. The Cole family farm has grown into a successful operation that provides fresh fruits, vegetables, and shiitake mushrooms for local direct market sales. When not working the land, Cole is a semi-driver and a former agricultural teacher.

Cole is also the former Chairman of Antrim County Republican Party, past President of Antrim County Farm Bureau, and he has nearly 20 years of executive experience as a member of many diverse boards and committees at the local, regional, and state level. A lifelong sportsman and hunting guide, he is very active in numerous hunting and firearm-rights groups.

The 105th district includes the counties of Antrim, Charlevoix, Montmorency, Oscoda, and Otsego.

For more information visit: www.TristonCole.com.

The Cole campaign can be followed at www.facebook.com/tristoncoleformi and www.twitter.com/triston_cole


  • Next Monthly Meeting; Monday, October 14th, 2024, 7:00 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. Location; Torch Lake Twp. Hall

  • Recent Comments


    • Paid for with
      Copyright