By JB Williams:

Who knows the whole truth about why Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty along with State Department officials Chris Stevens and Sean Smith died in Benghazi 11 September 2012?

It’s now public knowledge that the ever evolving official administration stories on Benghazi are all bold faced lies. It’s clear that the four Americans who were brutally murdered in Benghazi did not have to die. What’s not clear yet, is who is responsible for these murders? Nothing the Obama administration has told the people about Benghazi is true… but who is responsible?

General Carter Ham and Admiral Charles M. Gaouette know the answer to this question. Where are Ham and Gaouette today? Why hasn’t Issa’s investigative committee called these decorated Military officers to testify before the committee investigating Benghazi?

We have known since 30 October 2012 that these two officers…

1. Were ordered to STAND DOWN in Benghazi
2. Ignored those orders
3. Were relieved of duty for refusing orders to STAND DOWN

We know from the unclassified cables between Benghazi and DC and the subsequent Executive Brief, that cables were firing in all directions in the hours before and during the Benghazi attack that ended in the brutal death of four Americans.

General Ham was head of AFRICOM and Commander of the 2011 US-NATO operation to depose Gadhafi in Libya. Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette was in command of the Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3), then deployed in Middle Eastern waters during the attack on Benghazi.

Both Ham and Gaouette reported receiving the same desperate cables for additional security and backup that Obama administration officials received and ignored from Benghazi. They did not ignore those desperate calls for help ringing out from the Benghazi installation on 11 September 2012.

No, both Ham and Gaouette attempted to launch ready response teams in the region capable of provided the much needed assistance during the seven hour long assault on Benghazi. Both were then relieved of command for their actions, described by the US Military as “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.”

General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready to deploy to Benghazi. Then, General Ham received the order to stand down. His response was “screw it,” – he was going to help anyway.

Within minutes after issuing an order to deploy his ready response team, Ham’s second in command APPREHENDED the General and told him that he was now relieved of his command. Ham knows who issued the order to STAND DOWN as well as the order to relieve him of his command at AFRICOM.

Adm. Gaouette had also received the startling requests for support as the attack unfolded in Benghazi. Like Ham, he readied a response from Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3). Gaouette was also ordered to STAND DOWN and like Ham, he decided to refuse those orders. Gaouette readied vital intelligence and communications operations for an extraction effort to be launched by Ham.

Stars and Stripes reported October 18, 2012 that General Ham is being replaced by Gen. David Rodriguez. They also reported on October 27, 2012 that Adm. Gaouette is being replaced by Rear Adm. Troy M. Shoemaker. The Navy stated that it was “replacing the admiral in command of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East, pending the outcome of an internal investigation into undisclosed allegations of inappropriate judgment.”

What were the “inappropriate judgments” of these two decorated Military leaders? Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Navy’s chief spokesman, declined to discuss the investigation.

What we know is that these two highly unusual acts to remove two highly decorated commanders is related to the 11 September 2012 strike on Benghazi. We also know that the congressional investigation has not yet called these valiant men in to give testimony.

We know that months’ worth of warnings and requests for additional security at Benghazi we ignored and denied by the Clinton run State Department and that someone gave the DoD order to STAND DOWN when American troops were in the region and ready to assist.

We know that the Obama administration manufactured a lie about some obscure anti-Islam youtube clip that had nothing whatsoever to do with the events of 11 September 2012 Benghazi. We know that the Obama administration is holding that filmmaker in prison today. We know that Benghazi survivors have been threatened and silenced.

But most of all, we know that Gen. Ham and Adm. Gaouette can provide very real answers to a laundry list of very important questions regarding the Benghazi attacks and Issa’s alleged investigation.

On 23 April 2013, Five House Committees investigating Benghazi issued a joint Interim Progress Report. In it, all five committees fail to ask the right questions and all five demonstrate a clear intent to keep the truth about Benghazi under wraps, though the report does confirm almost everything stated herein.

The attack in Benghazi of 11 September, 2012 is now almost eight months old and yet, the truth about that attack is still a distant fog sheltered by government officials engaged in blatant obstruction of justice, made possible by the help of a totally incompetent or complicit press.

If you want to know what really happened in Benghazi, demand that Issa’s congressional committee subpoena both Gen. Ham and Adm. Gaouette to testify before the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform.

And then, recall Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta once Ham and Gaouette have testified.

Someone is responsible for the murder of Americans in Benghazi and the lies that followed. That someone, in fact all who are involved in the Benghazi murder and the cover up, must be held fully accountable.

© Copyright by JB Williams, 2013. All rights reserved.

Three Words To End The IRS…”The Fair Tax”!!!

Why do attorneys tell defendants, “Never apologize”!!!???  Friday, the IRS apologized for its “inappropriate” targeting of political groups during the 2012 election, to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status.   Not all political groups,…just ones with certain terms in their names – like “Patriot” or “TEA  Party.”   You know, conservative terms.

As the story snowballed, we learned that senior IRS officials knew of it as early as 2011.   And a pro-Israel group was already suing the IRS, after they were allegedly told that their views conflicted with prevailing government policy.

Conservative groups had long complained about IRS persecution, but were dismissed.   Now, the House Ways and Means Committee has demanded the IRS hand over by Wednesday every record containing those conservative terms.

You see, what the IRS calls an apology is more accurately termed a “confession.”   What they call “inappropriate,” legal experts might call “felonious.”   And if you want a simple three-word term that could end IRS abuses of power for good, try this: “The Fair Tax.”

Close the IRS,…Repeal the 16th Amendment and Replace our current Tax System.  We should STOP taxing Income, Profits and Gains,…and make EVERYONE pay into our tax revenue system when they CONSUME items or services.  “Illegal Immigrants, Prostitutes, Pimps and Bookies” and ALL other cash earners would start paying to fund our Federal government!!!

Many very wealthy people who have sold businesses, stocks and real estate in the past have moved those profits/gains to offshore bank accounts in the Grand Cayman Islands to avoid U.S. federal taxes.

Over $18 Trillion Dollars now sits in those accounts and could be brought back into our U.S. economy, if we close the IRS and repeal our current income tax system and replace it with The Fair Tax.

What would these very wealthy people do with those newly “tax-free” funds?  Invest it in our stock market, U.S. real estate and new businesses that would employ Americans in an effort to make more “tax-free” income, profits and gains!!!

We could turn America around IMMEDIATELY,…with three simple words,…”The Fair Tax”!!!

After American diplomatic facilities in Libya came under sustained assault by militia forces, the Obama administration – including the president and Secretary of State themselves – spent days insisting that the attacks were a spontaneous reaction to an obscure YouTube video that insulted the Muslim prophet Muhammed.

The intelligence community was incensed at what some called a “cover up” of the administration’s mishandling of the situation.

As more information trickled out, the administration was eventually forced to admit that the attacks that claimed the lives of Amb. Chris Stevens and three other Americans were acts of terrorism.

But the “cover up” hasn’t stopped there. Information continues to emerge suggesting poor preparation for the anniverary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, and potential disregard for the safety of personnel there. Stevens requested a prolonged stay for a 16-member security detail there, for instance, but that request was denied.  The Obama administration owes the American people a full, honest explanation for its actions in Libya. Its rhetoric does not match reality, as Heritage’s new video indisputably shows.

An Incriminating Timeline: Obama Administration and Libya

The latest incriminating information on the U.S. consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya indicates that the State Department turned down a request for additional security from concerned U.S. embassy staff.

New evidence shows there were security threats in Libya in the months prior to the deadly September 11 attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Despite these threats, the State Department left its personnel there to fend for themselves.

And when the terrorist attack did take place, the Obama Administration peddled the ridiculous story that an offensive, amateurish, anti-Islam YouTube video was to blame in order to avoid characterizing the murders of four Americans as terrorism.

Read more of the story and see the video evidence at this link:  http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2012/10/cia-agents-confirm-obama-told-them-not-to-aid-ambassador-chris-stevens-the-white-house-disinformation-campaign-on-libya-2445322.html

Justice Department secretly obtained AP phone records

The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative’s top executive called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into how news organizations gather the news.

The records obtained by the Justice Department listed incoming and outgoing calls, and the duration of each call, for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP.

In all, the government seized those records for more than 20 separate telephone lines assigned to AP and its journalists in April and May of 2012. The exact number of journalists who used the phone lines during that period is unknown but more than 100 journalists work in the offices whose phone records were targeted on a wide array of stories about government and other matters.

In a letter of protest sent to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday, AP President and Chief Executive Officer Gary Pruitt said the government sought and obtained information far beyond anything that could be justified by any specific investigation. He demanded the return of the phone records and destruction of all copies.

“There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters. These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP’s newsgathering operations, and disclose information about AP’s activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know,” Pruitt said.

The government would not say why it sought the records. U.S. officials have previously said in public testimony that the U.S. attorney in Washington is conducting a criminal investigation into who may have leaked information contained in a May 7, 2012, AP story about a foiled terror plot. The story disclosed details of a CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an Al Qaeda plot in the spring of 2012 to detonate a bomb on an airplane bound for the United States.

In testimony in February, CIA Director John Brennan noted that the FBI had questioned him about whether he was AP’s source, which he denied. He called the release of the information to the media about the terror plot an “unauthorized and dangerous disclosure of classified information.”

Prosecutors have sought phone records from reporters before, but the seizure of records from such a wide array of AP offices, including general AP switchboards numbers and an office-wide shared fax line, is unusual and largely unprecedented.

In the letter notifying the AP received Friday, the Justice Department offered no explanation for the seizure, according to Pruitt’s letter and attorneys for the AP. The records were presumably obtained from phone companies earlier this year although the government letter did not explain that. None of the information provided by the government to the AP suggested the actual phone conversations were monitored.

Among those whose phone numbers were obtained were five reporters and an editor who were involved in the May 7, 2012 story.

The Obama administration has aggressively investigated disclosures of classified information to the media and has brought six cases against people suspected of leaking classified information, more than under all previous presidents combined.

Justice Department published rules require that subpoenas of records from news organizations must be personally approved by the attorney general but it was not known if that happened in this case. The letter notifying AP that its phone records had been obtained though subpoenas was sent Friday by Ronald Machen, the U.S. attorney in Washington.

Spokesmen in Machen’s office and at the Justice Department had no immediate comment on Monday.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/13/justice-department-secretly-obtains-ap-phone-records/#ixzz2TDNwAJPH

The Antrim County Republican Women is hosting their monthly meeting on Monday, May 13th, 2013 at 12 p.m. (Noon) at the Pelican Inn in Central Lake, MI.

The Luncheon’s cost is $15.  Guest speaker will be Antrim County Republican Party Chairman, Randy Bishop who will be making a presentation regarding “Agenda – Grinding America Down” and “Agenda 21 – The History and Future of Northern Michigan”.

A short trailer can be viewed at this link: http://vimeo.com/13722147

Please come join us to be informed and network with other Antrim County Republican Women.

Link for driving directions: http://binged.it/13iw3gB

South Carolina House passes bill making ‘Obamacare’ implementation a crime!

The South Carolina state House passed a bill Wednesday that declares President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to be “null and void,” and criminalizes its implementation.

The state’s Freedom of Health Care Protection Act intends to “prohibit certain individuals from enforcing or attempting to enforce such unconstitutional laws; and to establish criminal penalties and civil liability for violating this article.”

The measure permits the state Attorney General, with reasonable cause, “to restrain by temporary restraining order, temporary injunction, or permanent injunction” any person who is believed to be causing harm to any person or business with the implementation of Obamacare.

Earlier this year in her state of the state address, Gov. Nikki Haley said that South Carolina does not want and cannot afford the president’s plan, “not now, not ever.”

“To that end, we will not pursue the type of government-run health exchanges being forced on us by Washington,” she said. “Despite the rose-colored rhetoric coming out of D.C., these exchanges are nothing more than a way to make the state do the federal government’s bidding in spending massive amounts of taxpayer dollars on insurance subsidies that we can’t afford.”

The nullification bill moved on to the state Senate Thursday and referred to the Committee on Finance.

“Now that Michigan has refused to implement a Healthcare Exchange and Healthcare Partnership for Obamacare,…we now have to nullify the entire law from being implemented here in Michigan”, said 105th District – Michigan State Representative Greg MacMaster.  “We have no choice and have to do everything we can to help save Michigan businesses from the exorbitant costs and expenses of Obamacare, and try to help save Michigan jobs”.   MacMaster said.

“I haven’t seen any of those…” Local NYC/NBC reporter Ida Siegel told the male videographer who confronted her.

“You haven’t seen any of those?” the videographer asked.

“No, I haven’t — what are they, what do they represent?” Seigel replied.

“The hammer and sickle, you don’t know what that represents?” he pressed.

Siegel at that point asked which group the videographer was with.

“I’m not with any group, I’m just curious as a major media company if you’re going to show in the story you do about this the hammer and sickle flags,” he said.

See the full exchange below:

[youtube_sc url=”http://youtu.be/pZcqJf5gcG8″]

HOUSTON (TheBlaze/AP) — Former Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum praised the National Rifle Association as “warriors” defending the U.S. Constitution.

Santorum spoke Friday in the political rally at the NRA’s national convention in Houston. The convention is being held amid the backdrop of the fierce gun control debate raging across the country and the recent defeat of a major gun control bill in the U.S. Senate.

Santorum began his speech by honoring slain Navy SEAL sniper Chris Kyle and his wife, Taya, who spoke right before him at the event. “That is the face — Taya, Chris — of what this movement is about. Heroic people who care deeply and love this country. Who love this country for what it is, for what it has always been,” Santorum added.

He said the government’s biggest responsibility is to protect Americans’ inalienable rights, something it is failing miserably to do in regards to the Second Amendment.

“So when Barack Obama says he wants to transform America, what does he mean?” Santorum asked.

Many times throughout his address, Santorum raised his voice as he fired up thousands of Second Amendment supporters in attendance. The speech was arguably one of the most passionate that he’s ever given — at least in recent memory.

Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania, told NRA members that the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment “come from God.”

Santorum said by helping to defeat the Senate bill, the NRA “stood up when freedom was under assault. You stood in the gap. You made a difference.”

He also said the debate over gun control is one over the country’s core traditional values.

“The reason the transformation of America that Barack Obama is talking about is well on its way is because the folks on that side live it every minute of their day,” Santorum said. “They are marginalizing anyone who disagrees with them…Don’t let them!   You must in every aspect of your life understand the battle that is before us, because they do.”

The Pentagon has hired a Jewish activist who has been outspoken in his opposition to “Conservative Christianity” to serve as a consultant and develop new policies on religious tolerance.

Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, has spoken out against a number of conservative Christian groups, calling them “Fundamentalist Christian Monsters.”

MRFF, which says its primary goal is to advocate for the separation of church and state, has said that most of its members are Christian. Weinstein, however, has decried what he calls “virulent religious oppression” coming from conservative groups, comparing them to “bigots” from the Deep South during the civil rights era.

“These days, when anyone attempts to bravely stand up against virulent religious oppression, these monstrosities cry out alligator tears in overflowing torrents and scream that it is, in fact, THEY who are the dispossessed, bereft and oppressed. C’mon, really, you pitiable unconstitutional carpetbaggers?” Weinstein wrote for The Huffington Post.

Weinstein has expressed disagreement especially with the conservative argument for traditional marriage, writing about pro-family groups: “The extremist, militant nature of these virulently homophobic organizations’ rhetorically-charged propaganda.”

Some of the conservative groups Weinstein has targeted include Focus on the Family, the American Family Association, the Family Research Council, and the Chaplains Alliance for Religious Liberty.

He said that he agrees with the Southern Poverty Law Center’s designation of these organizations as “hate groups.”

Read more at http://global.christianpost.com/news/pentagon-hires-anti-conservative-activist-who-branded-fundamentalists-as-christian-monsters-95067/#rz46IXQrYGRw3VSF.99